Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add filters








Language
Year range
1.
Chinese Journal of Surgery ; (12): 618-625, 2017.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-809116

ABSTRACT

Objective@#To assess the perioperative safety of preoperative restricted fluid administration and liberal fluid administration for pancreatic surgery.@*Methods@#The randomized controlled trials comparing restricted and liberal in pancreatic surgery were collected by searching the databases of PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane Library.Two reviewers independently selected studies according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, then extracted the data and assessed the quality of included studies.Meta-analysis was performed by RevMan 5.3 software.@*Results@#A total of 4 studies involving 785 patients were finally included, with 396 cases in restricted group and 389 cases in liberal group.Results of Meta-analysis showed that there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in terms of intraoperative blood loss, postoperative complications, mortality, reoperation in-hospital and length of stay(all P>0.05).@*Conclusion@#With regard to pancreatic surgery, restricted fluid administration do not have outstanding advantages.

2.
Journal of China Medical University ; (12): 126-130,135, 2017.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-606761

ABSTRACT

Objective To compare the short-term clinical outcomes of hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery(HALS),laparoscopic-assisted surgery (LAS)and open surgery(OS)for colorectal cancer treatment. Methods The clinical data of 74 patients underwent HALS,LAS and OS for colorectal cancer treatment between October 2011 and December 2015 were assessed retrospectively. All the surgeries were performed by the same surgical team. The intraoperative details,postoperative recovery,postoperative complications,oncologic results and cost were compared among the three groups. Results A total of 24 patients in HALS group,25 patients in LAS group and 25 patients in OS group were finally included. The gen-eral data and oncologic baseline were comparable among the three groups. The comparative results showed that the operative time increase d and in-cision length shortened gradually in OS group,HALS group and LAS group(P0.05). In terms of post-operative recovery,postoperative complications and oncologic results,there was no statistical difference between the three groups(P>0.05). As for cost,the total cost and operative cost of OS group were lower than HALS group and LAS group(P0.05). The material cost increase gradually in OS group ,HALS group and LAS group(P0.05). Conclusion HALS,LAS and OS are compen-satory with each other,and clinicians can choose the reasonable procedure according to personal proficiency and situation of patients.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL